236 Priory Crescent
Prittlewell
Southend-on-Sea
SS2 6PR
5th December 2001
The Director of Technical and Environmental Services
Southend on Sea Borough Council
Civic Centre
Victoria Avenue
Southend-on-Sea
SS2 6ER
Dear Sir
Re: Priory Crescent
I have now read the current issue of Civic News, which gives details of the
proposals of road alterations to Priory Crescent and wish to comment as
follows.
- Environmental: You fail to answer the question of exactly how many trees
will be lost to this plan. I feel the reason you are failing to state how
many trees will be lost is because the number is in excess of 100. In
addition to the trees along the road, there are at least a further 15 mature
trees which are along the boundary and would have to be felled. The large
horse chestnuts within the park would overhang the road and have to be cut
back. As we are all aware, the roots of many of the trees within the park
are under the pavement and any road development would damage them.
- You state that there is potential to improve environment in Priory
Crescent South. What about Priory Crescent North? Although the council has
received requests for pollution monitoring along this section of road, none
has been forthcoming. Why? The council plans are to destroy in excess of
100 trees yet no consideration has been given to increased pollution. With
traffic lights installed at Cuckoo Corner, there will most certainly be at
least two westbound lanes of stationary traffic. I would like to request
that pollution monitoring takes place. It is the proposal to bring the
traffic nearer to the properties along this section of road yet no
consideration, contact, or dialogue has taken place by any council member,
with the residents affected. Obviously Southend Council do not feel human
rights exist.
- The council is unable to say that journey times will improve. What
on earth is the point then of making a dual carriageway? All it will do it
move the traffic along a bit further for it to sit at traffic lights. So
far no mention has been made of improvements to the Bell junction. With
four way lights this is a major bottleneck. In the morning the traffic can
trail back to Tesco's roundabout and in the evenings back down Victoria
Avenue. This alone causes problems at Cuckoo Corner. Surely if the traffic
was filtered before it got to the Bell, this would ease the congestion at
this junction. It seems that all traffic is pushed towards central Southend
before it goes out again to Westcliff and Leigh. Maybe traffic lights will
work at Cuckoo Corner, but I remember the traffic lights at Sutton Road and
that was sheer chaos.
- By putting the footpath and possible cyclepath on the south side of
Priory Crescent within the park, you are in fact taking part of the park.
There have then, been many false statements issued by council members with
the Leader of the Council, Charles Latham yet again saying in the Civic News
that no park land will be lost. I see this as a prelude to moving the
boundary of the park at a later date so that this pathway will in fact be
outside the park. By placing a pathway within the park, this would probably
affect the football pitches and cricket pitch. What happens when the park
is closed? Very little consideration appears to have been given to
pedestrians and cyclists. A large number of schoolchildren, commuters and
cyclists use Priory Crescent and this plan removes the pavement on one side
of the road and reduces the size of the pavement on the other side. Yet you
state that you want to retain pedestrian safety. These proposals contradict
this statement.
- Has a study been carried out of the lorries that use the Prittlebrook
Industrial Estate? This road proposal would make it extremely difficult for
them to turn into the estate. The alternative would be for them to access
the estate from Manners Way!
- Unfortunately, I cannot help but think that the councillors have not
looked at this proposal in a fair and unbiased way. This is mass destruction
of a busy but attractive area, driven by money. A fact that I have heard
related by at least two councillors!
To sum up, perhaps traffic lights at Cuckoo Corner would help the problem of
the junction, I am not sure. Usually putting in roundabouts and removing
lights helps problem junctions. As it appears only one lane can proceed
westbound from Priory Crescent to Prince Avenue, due to the Victoria Avenue
filter lane, this scheme could be tested without making Priory Crescent a
dual carriageway and alleviating all the environmental damage that would be
caused.
Needless to say I am completely against your preferred option.
Yours faithfully,
D Banning (Mrs)